Ok, lets take these one by one:
- It isn't a single sale. I'm referring to a trend. A picture made up of individual dots, which has been consistently increasing in this hobby over the last several years, and especially the last year. (And if you can remember, we even had megathreads about some of those as well. Kozmik Krooz'r anyone?) There have been MANY games that traditionally traded in a given range for years which have suddenly been inflated into the 3k/4k/5k/6k+ range, and *not* because there are suddenly a lot more people wanting them (which is a key element that makes this different from normal supply and demand.)
- Regarding Bob's $100 EDOT, I also pointed out
in the other thread that too-low prices don't affect the overall market the way high-profile inflated sales do.
- Regarding auctions, there's a difference between honestly and transparently trying to get a fair market price for something (via an open auction), and using a power-play tactic that involves intentionally obfuscating the process and hiding information to try to squeeze more out of people willing to pay thousands of dollars more than the next person in line. The former is good for the community and economy. The latter is not (and frankly is sleazy, IMO. You may disagree.)
- Dismissing any commentary on this as petty or bitter simply sweeps away and dismisses the larger system-level effects these cycles or predatory selling and overpaying have on the larger community. I have nothing personal against the specific seller or buyer here. It's the larger system effects that I'm more concerned about.
My sense that your argument is, "As long as seller and buyer are happy, who cares. It's none of your business. The end justifies the means." And if it's a prostitute and a john making a consensual transaction completely in private, I agree. But when things are done publicly in a community forum and market, there are secondary effects that impact the larger group, and are attributable to BOTH the seller and buyer (as it's really the codependent relationship between the two that causes a larger effect). You can argue whether you care about those effects or not, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
Want evidence? Just look at Pinside. The reason new pins are in the $8000-10000+ range these days is because prices have been driven up by *that* community for years (which has been much more about dick-flexing than the arcade community). It isn't because it costs Stern that much more to make pins today vs 30 years ago.
A similar trend is starting to leak over here, and *is* having an effect on the hobby as a whole (on top of additional natural factors that are also driving prices higher.)
And lastly, you can flex your dick while it's hard. Usually to make it look a little bigger for whoever you're trying to impress.