price check- asteroids cocktail

cadillacman

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
15,504
Reaction score
542
Location
Roscoe, Illinois
Rating - 100%
12   0   0
fully working. Not mint but decent condition.. what do ya think shes worth? Ive been offered one as a trade for my trilogy deluxe... in on the fence..never been a big fan of that cocktail cabinet style.. How is reliability wise? My last vector(battlezone) was an effing nightmare..
 
fully working. Not mint but decent condition.. what do ya think shes worth? Ive been offered one as a trade for my trilogy deluxe... in on the fence..never been a big fan of that cocktail cabinet style.. How is reliability wise? My last vector(battlezone) was an effing nightmare..
If you're not a fan of cocktail tables, skip it. Asteroids is one of the most common tables, they routinely go for $150-$200 working in fair-good condition. Reliability-wise, it has the usual issues that any Asteroids game has. The tables themselves are sturdy but aesthetically dull.
 
Reliability wise they are OK, the issue for me was the 13" monitor. The only CT I kept was my Tempest because it has a 19" monitor. If it is in decent shape I would say no more than $250-$300. Average condition I would agree with the $150-$200 range.
 
yeah im thinking it and something else or some money or something...
I definitely wouldn't do a straight up trade for your Star Wars machine. The board alone from your Star Wars could be worth as much as the whole Asteroids machine. I paid right around 300 when I had to buy a board for my Trilogy cab. I have an Asteroids cocktail and I like it. Once I had the board repaired, I haven't run into any other problems yet.
 
I had an AD cocktail and loved it. Only reason I sold mine was I got one in a cabaret. Sold it for $250 and that was on CL for sale for a long time.
That said, I don't think I'd consider a trade for the Trilogy if that's all what is considered on the deal as others have mentioned. If it were a color vector, then that's a different story.
 
Sorry to bump an old post, I may have searched in the wrong section-- whoops!
 
Back
Top Bottom