D_Harris
Well-known member
Which word are you having difficulty with, "ultimate" or "player"?
We are talking about skill levels. The hypothetical ultimate player would have the highest degree of skill possible, and he would not break a pattern; because breaking a pattern = a mistake.
If you can't figure out as basic of a point as the one you are asking about here, then you should probably stop replying altogether.
It is a reply to your statement.
Says the fellow who was confused over a barnyard basic point... and admitted it (lol).
Yes, they do. If your method of play results in the ghosts being grouped so that you can eat all of them while they are still vulnerable, then you have grouped them. Was the first person who ever played what is now considered a pattern, grouping them when he, you know, grouped them? Whether the grouping is done in ad hoc fashion because the player screwed up, breaking the pattern; or as a pattern of movements known to group the ghosts, it is still grouping the ghosts.
First, an obvious, simple, and direct point eluded you; now, something equally simple has left you sporting a confused and blank stare, wondering what I am talking about? Why are you even replying if you can't follow along?
As a matter of fact, I was replying to what was said. That you believe otherwise is indicative of reading comprehension issues on your part.
Of course it does. The hypothetical ultimate player would complete the game in the fastest time that is possible given the parameters of the game code; because he would make no errors. Whoever is closest to the fastest possible completion time, while satisfying the goal of a perfect game, is the best known player.
"Credibility" is irrelevant when it comes to matters of fact. When a fact is stated, it remains a fact regardless of the source.
You are apparently trying to redefine the word "grouping". Unfortunately, you don't get to do that. If the ghosts have been grouped, then the player has grouped them; regardless of whether he was "winging it" or following a pattern.
I see you spewed all that garbage just to start a "debate" with me that has no points from your end whatsoever.
At first I thought you were just ignorant, but now I see what you are doing. So rather than respond to any more of your drivel, I'll just move on and let you target someone else.
BTW. I am the one who coined the term "grouping" back in the mid 80s...
Darren Harris
Staten Island, New York.
Last edited:
