Adam Judd, Gregory Foster, West Prototype, MFG.com

Find someone else to bicker with. I have no interest in satiating your pathological need for attention.


I'm posting facts. You post something in a public place, you can expect public replies. Sorry if that's inconvenient for you.

This is a topic that believe it or not, many people STILL don't know about, despite the amount of discussion it's gotten over the years here.
 
Strangely enough as big as KLOV is there are tons of arcade people that don't even know it's existence. This is a very technical forum. Very few people are DIY handy men in today's world. I'd say 95 percent of KLOV's member base is just here to by cabs and parts in the FS section.

Just my .02
I'm posting facts. You post something in a public place, you can expect public replies. Sorry if that's inconvenient for you.

This is a topic that believe it or not, many people STILL don't know about, despite the amount of discussion it's gotten over the years here.
 
This is "Cara". Some speculation it was actually Jan pretending to be her. The actual court case listed above says otherwise....at least I think so.

I can vouch for the "legitimacy" of Cara; she is a real person, and I've been in contact with her over the years.

She was actually a victim of Adam even before RAM Controls; some business deal he scammed her with, sometimes in 2008-2009.
It had nothing to do with Arcade stuff whatsoever.

She was taken for QUITE a bit, likely more so than all of KLOV members combined.

She went to great pains to track him down, take him to court, and she won ... in abstentia.
She's been trying to get her money back for over 15 years.

She's been in contact with many of Adam's victims over the years,
and I know she is talking with AJtoLifePlease right now.
(...she would also like to reach SoDak )

If anyone wants to reach her, I have her contact info. PM me.
She is keen to talk to anyone who's been victimized by over $10K ...

Steph
 
I'm not sure I follow…. What would be stupid?
I would say he meant he had to be very stupid to continue to try to "sell" items as in continuing his scams while he is out on bale charged with defrauding companies and people. I am not sure if the investigators are just looking at the suppliers that have been wronged for thousands or if they are working on all his scams as a whole. No one will ever see any money returned that is just the way it works. Judgements mean nothing if they have nothing to pay with. All we can hope for is he gets the lengthy sentence he deserves after years of grifting. Even if they do investigate all the thousands of customers, he ripped of it will not amount to much more then lumping on. I have investigated similar incidents and only a few major ones actually get a conviction. Some of the smaller cases are plead out to get them to plead guilty to the large charges. Not much difference other than saving the trouble of a trial. I hate to say it but if you break bad you should do it big. You will never get charged with everything you steal, and the penalties are similar if there are a few incidents or hundreds of incidents.
 
Continuing to scam people after you've been surveilled, raided, arrested, inventory confiscated, jailed and bailed out.
I don't think an overabundance of brain cells brought him to where he is in life. He knows the jig is up and he is probably looking at a few years in prison at least. Why not try to get some more bail money. The most it would do is violate his bond conditions and he goes to jail a little sooner while awaiting trial.
 
All evidence already in place, Travis Raynolds, Adam Judd, Greg Foster that we know of as of now. List keep going ...........
I personably track this guy down and spoke to the mail man and got all the names, it's the south everybody friendly if you have a reason.
He got really worried when i was talking to the mail man, that is the reason i got him. Because none of the neighbors know Greg Foster.
Nice work! That's real detective work, out on the street asking questions. Love it!
 
And it's totally legal to recover your own property. The police will even tell you it's a civil matter and they can do nothing.
If he is charged criminally, it is now not a civil matter and it opens things up to restitution but again can't get blood from a stone. To make a bad deal criminal you have to prove the whole deal was an intent to defraud and he meant to take your money and give you nothing from the start. This does not cover when someone makes bad business decisions and ends up not delivering. Fraud is a specific intent crime. If he meant to make good on the deal but was a bad businessperson and could not deliver, then this is a civil matter. In this case his intent to defraud is easily proven based on his using different company names and further using different aliases also proves it. Some cases have to be proven after a bunch of cases show a clear intent to never deliver so one person going to the PD to make a report would have them getting turned away as a civil matter. Most people don't have the ability to do the homework to know this or convey it to the officer.
 
If he is charged criminally, it is now not a civil matter and it opens things up to restitution but again can't get blood from a stone. To make a bad deal criminal you have to prove the whole deal was an intent to defraud and he meant to take your money and give you nothing from the start. This does not cover when someone makes bad business decisions and ends up not delivering. Fraud is a specific intent crime. If he meant to make good on the deal but was a bad businessperson and could not deliver, then this is a civil matter. In this case his intent to defraud is easily proven based on his using different company names and further using different aliases also proves it. Some cases have to be proven after a bunch of cases show a clear intent to never deliver so one person going to the PD to make a report would have them getting turned away as a civil matter. Most people don't have the ability to do the homework to know this or convey it to the officer.
Oh I understand he's been arrested and that is a criminal case. The fact that the stuff in the driveway hasn't been confiscated for evidence says to me, it's not part of the criminal complaint. Any of us could go get the stuff and declare ownership. That would take it into civil litigation.
 
Oh I understand he's been arrested and that is a criminal case. The fact that the stuff in the driveway hasn't been confiscated for evidence says to me, it's not part of the criminal complaint. Any of us could go get the stuff and declare ownership. That would take it into civil litigation.
Who said it was not taken as evidence? The pictures were from the surveillance the victim did for his evidence he gave to the police. It has been stated a search warrant was executed and thousands of dollars of stolen stuff was located. Search warrants are for gaining evidence and stolen property is evidence. Again, criminal prosecution equals restitution. If it was a civil matter with no criminal charges involved, then you would need to sue. You can still sue but most of the time in a criminal case it is redundant and not necessary unless they beat the original charge. The level of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal trial, but a civil trial is a preponderance of the evidence and a much lower standard. The victim stated the pallets were his property that was delivered to the address, so I seriously doubt it was left there. I am sure he can address that. I am a retired police detective and only dealt with this stuff as my profession for 27 years so I might be wrong.
 
Who said it was not taken as evidence? The pictures were from the surveillance the victim did for his evidence he gave to the police. It has been stated a search warrant was executed and thousands of dollars of stolen stuff was located. Search warrants are for gaining evidence and stolen property is evidence. Again, criminal prosecution equals restitution. If it was a civil matter with no criminal charges involved, then you would need to sue. You can still sue but most of the time in a criminal case it is redundant and not necessary unless they beat the original charge. The level of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal trial, but a civil trial is a preponderance of the evidence and a much lower standard. The victim stated the pallets were his property that was delivered to the address, so I seriously doubt it was left there. I am sure he can address that. I am a retired police detective and only dealt with this stuff as my profession for 27 years so I might be wrong.
Who said the stuff has been confiscated? Nobody as far I can tell.
My point is if someone has your property, you have the legal right to recover it.
Right or wrong?
 
If you can prove that the stuff in question is yours, the person who is in posession of it says you can take it, and it hasn't been confiscated as evidence in a criminal investigation well then sure, you can recover it.
Otherwise, YOU can be charged with theft if the person in posession of it accuses you of such or if it is evidence in an investigation and hasn't been released back to you- which isn't happening until there is a judgement and the case is closed.
Who said the stuff has been confiscated? Nobody as far I can tell.
My point is if someone has your property, you have the legal right to recover it.
Right or wrong?
 
If you can prove that the stuff in question is yours, the person who is in posession of it says you can take it, and it hasn't been confiscated as evidence in a criminal investigation well then sure, you can recover it.
Otherwise, YOU can be charged with theft if the person in posession of it accuses you of such or if it is evidence in an investigation and hasn't been released back to you- which isn't happening until there is a judgement and the case is closed.
Testimony is proof.
Me: that's my property officer.
Guy who stole my stuff: it's mine, I bought it.
Officer: there is nothing I can do...this is a civil matter.
True story
 
Back
Top Bottom