That sounds totally weird to me.
Why would a _TV_ be dual freq ??
Since the line frequency (number of lines per second) is 15625 Hz (625 lines x 50 Hz / 2), the colour carrier frequency calculates as follows: 4.43361875 MHz = 283.75 * 15625 Hz + 25 Hz. (This is for PAL, but the equation is almost the same for NTSC since although it has more fps, it has less lines per frame).
The 15kHz freq. is very much locked to the number of frames and lines per frame of transmitted TV signals (both PAL and NTSC).
There was no source that could produce 24kHz signals for a TV to reproduce, unless you'd hook up a computer that was capable of that (non were in the 80's not sure how old the TV's you mean are)
The same is true for a med-res tube. Even if it was a med-res tube, the picture wouldn't benefit from it because the signal it reproduced was still low res.
Again, a totally other source (computer) would be needed to output anything med-res.
Anyway, it's easy to see if a CRT is low or med-res, I can see it with the eye.
If you look closely at a med-res CRT like the original Amplifone /Rauland CRT, you will notice that the "dots" are much smaller compared to a regular (low) res tube.
I think you (or Joey) maybe mixing up with some monitors that NEC produced, I think in the late 80's/early 90's that were called Multisync (those were TRUELLY Mutlisync, meaning that they could do signals from 15 kHz up to 35 kHz modes.
Those monitors would work great with f.i. Atari ST's which had different frequencies for color (low) and b/w (med I guess) outputs.
The later Multisyncs lost the 15 kHz capability, but the name was SO settled that it sticks even today with LCD monitors (interesting, how to multi"sync" an LCD ??)
However, I'm absolutely positive that no 25" original true multisyncs were ever made. They were 14" which was a normal computer monitor size those days. Only "pro's" had some very special 19" b/w monitors for DTP (wow, that's a term you don't hear anymore those days....

)